Planned Dystopia

What is sold to the public as the promise of equality and ecological sustainability is a brutal assault on human dignity and liberty

In the New World Order, the state is the single owner of everything. Instead of using the new technologies as an instrument of betterment, the plan of the “Great Reset” seeks to use the technological possibilities as a tool of enslavement.

Welcome to the New World Order

The New World Order conceived by the World Economic Forum (WEF)foresees a totalitarian service economy, where the government will provide basic accommodation, food, and transport, while the rest must be lent from the state. The use of natural resources will be brought down to a minimum. In cooperation with a few key countries, a global agency would set the price of CO2 emissions at an extremely high level to disincentivize its use. To attain “sustainable agriculture,” the food supply will be mainly vegetarian.

In a publication for the World Economic Forum, the Danish ecoactivist Ida Auken who was her country’s minister of the environment from 2011 to 2014, elaborated a scenario for the future. In “Welcome to 2030,” she envisions a world where “I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.” By 2030, so says her scenario, the owning of goods has become obsolete because everything that once was a product is now a service, and the government will provide this service.

In this new world of imagination, people have free access to transportation, accommodation, food, “and all the things we need in our daily lives.” As these things will become free of charge, “it ended up not making sense for us to own much.” There would be no private ownership of houses, nor would anyone pay rent, “because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.” A person’s living room, for example, will be used for business meetings when one is absent. Concerns like “lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment” are things of the past.

Ida Auken predicts that people will be happy to enjoy such a good life that is so much better “than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.”

In her 2019 contribution to the Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils of the World Economic Forum, Ida Auken foretells how the world may look in the future “if we win the war on climate change.” By 2030, when CO2 emissions are greatly reduced, people will live in a world where meeting on the dinner plate “will be a rare sight” while water and the air will be much cleaner than today. Because of the shift from buying goods to using services, the need to have money will vanish, because people will spend less and less on goods. Work time will shrink, and leisure time will grow.

For the future, one must envision a city where electric cars have substituted conventional combustion vehicles. Most of the roads and parking spaces will have become green parks and walking zones for pedestrians. By 2030, agriculture will offer mainly plant-based alternatives to the food supply instead of meat and dairy products. The use of land to produce animal feed will greatly diminish and nature will be spreading across the globe again.

The World Economic Forum and its related institutions in combination with a handful of governments and a few high-tech companies want to lead the world into a new era without property or privacy. Values like individualism, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are at stake, to be repudiated in favor of collectivism and the imposition of a “common good” that is defined by the self-proclaimed elite of technocrats.

It is left to our imagination to figure out who will program the algorithms that manage the distribution of goods and services.

Fabricating Social Consent

How can people be brought to accept such a system? The bait to entice the masses is the assurance of comprehensive healthcare and a guaranteed basic income. The promoters of the Great Reset promise a world without diseases. Due to biotechnologically produced organs and individualized genetics-based medical treatments, a drastically increased life expectancy and even immortality are said to be possible. Artificial intelligence will eradicate death and eliminate disease and mortality. The race is on among biotechnological companies to find the key to eternal life.

Along with the promise of turning any ordinary person into a godlike superman, the promise of a “universal basic income” is highly attractive, particularly to those who will no longer find a job in the new digital economy. Obtaining a basic income without having to go through the treadmill and the disgrace of applying for social assistance is used as bait to get the support of the poor.

To make it economically viable, the guarantee of a basic income would require the leveling of wage differences. The technical procedures of the money transfer from the state will be used to promote a cashless society. With the digitization of all monetary transactions, each purchase will be registered. As a consequence, the governmental authorities would have unrestricted access to supervise in detail how individual persons spend their money. A universal basic income in a cashless society would provide the conditions to impose a social credit system and deliver the mechanism to sanction undesirable behavior and identify the superfluous and unwanted.

Who will be the rulers?

There is no reason to expect that the new power holders would be benevolent. Yet even if the top decision-makers of the new world government were not mean but just technocrats, what reason would an administrative technocracy have to go on with the undesirables? What sense does it make for a technocratic elite to turn the common man into a superman? Why share the benefits of artificial intelligence with the masses and not keep the wealth for the chosen few?

Not being swayed away by the utopian promises, a sober assessment of the plans must conclude that in this new world, there would be no place for the average person and that they would be put away along with the “unemployable,” “feeble-minded,” and “ill-bred.” Behind the preaching of the progressive gospel of social justice by the promoters of the Great Reset and the establishment of a new world order lurks the sinister project of eugenics, which as a technique is now called “genetic engineering” and as a movement is named “transhumanism,” a term was coined by Julian Huxley, the first director of the UNESCO.

According to the projections of the WEF’s “Global Future Councils,” not only the goods of production would fall into the hands of the state, but private property and personal privacy would also be abolished. The coming expropriation would go further than even the communists had demanded. While presenting its vision of the New World Order in detail, the World Economic Forum is silent as to the question of who will be the new masters in this new world and who will rule the slaves.